If we’re going to slow down global warming scientists say we’re actually going to have to take billions of tonnes of CO2 out of the atmosphere.
So how do we do it? Plant trees or use machines?
Machine technology is expensive
Let’s start with machines.
There’s a sci-fi-looking plant that is working away right now, literally sucking CO2 out of the atmosphere.
It’s from a Swiss company called ClimeWorks and it’s located in Iceland.
________________________________________________________________________
Read Also : The concept of Human Development Needs to be Redefined!
_______________________________________________________________________
The machines use renewable geothermal energy, and the CO2 is pumped underground and eventually becomes rock:
This new technology is expensive.
The demonstration plant cost 10 million euros to build and can capture 4,000 tonnes of CO2 per year.
That’s 2500 euros per tonne, if you assume that the plant will be only active for one year. Climeworks doesn’t give an official figure per tonne for the plant in question, and says the plant will be operational for much longer than 12 months.
In any case, it’s pricey technology at the moment, but it has lots of political and business support, and once scaled up the price could drop to 150 euros a tonne.
Land suitable for tree planting is limited
Lots of environmentalists dislike industrial carbon capture technology, and many argue we should just plant trees – natural carbon capture machines.
________________________________________________________________________
Read Also : Education along with Research drives Growth & Development of Human Society
________________________________________________________________________
But you really need a lot of them to compensate for our emissions.
When we have exhausted all emission reduction and fixation options, trees are a great ally.
Diego Florian
FSC Italia
An average tree contains about a tonne of CO2, and the average European emits 5 to 7 tonnes of CO2 per year.
So you’d need to plant 5-7 trees every year from now onwards for the rest of your life to offset your emissions.
Do we even have enough land for those trees? Not really, not if we want to grow food, too.
In fact those that promote responsible forestry say planting trees has to be seen as a kind of top-up option once the reduction of emissions has been maximized.
________________________________________________________________________
READ ALSO : FROM ATTRACTING MATES TO SCARING PREDATORS AWAY, HERE ARE SIX REASONS WHY ANIMALS USE…
________________________________________________________________________
“When we have exhausted all emission reduction and fixation options, trees are a great ally,” says Diego Florian from FSC Italia.
So we need both trees and machines, but most of all reduced energy demand and a switch to clean power.
NOTE – This article was originally published in euronews and can be viewed here
Tags: #climate, #climatechange, #climatecrisis, #CO2, #environment, #getgreengetgrowing, #globalwarming, #gngagritech, #greenstories, #machines, #nature, #planting, #trees
